by Ginic on Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:42 am
My ancient Belize book is called Rubble and Roseleaves by FW Boreham, a missionary/pastor. So far it's good, but I haven't finished it yet. It's not the kind of book that you read cover to cover really. You see, each chapter stands on it's own as a separate thought. He compares common, everyday things in life in Australia, 1920's.
For example, chapter 5 is entitled “Living Dogs and Dead Lions.” The author asked his Sunday School class of a few children, if they would rather be a living dog or a dead lion. One says a living dog, the other a dead lion. The author points out how each response is related to part of our nature.
Some people would lean toward the living dog, simply because it is alive. We are fascinated by life and treasure it. It is this desire to stay alive that has us cheer on fictional heroes throughout their quests and causes us to save drowning men.
Another point of view was that of the dead lion, because a dead lion was once a living lion after all. He talks about paying such a high price for life, that we lose our worth, i.e. - seeking fame or fortune and selling whatever part of our conscience it costs to get it. This point of view says that dying the noble death of a lion, with all one’s beliefs and morals intact, is far better than trading that death for the life of a dog.
At the end of the chapter, Boreham points out that the life or death side isn’t the real factor, because all dead lions have been alive at some point and all living dogs will someday die; death comes to lion and canine alike. The real question is whether to be the dog or the lion…..